Преглед на новостите за белодробни инфекции, публикувани през 2011 г.

Update in Respiratory Infections 2011

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 185 2012

Richard G. Wunderink1 and Michael S. Niederman2

1Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and 2Department of Medicine, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York

 

Respiratory tract infections again featured prominently in the Journal and other publications in 2011. We will discuss updates in respiratory tract infections, classified by the traditional breakdowns by site of acquisition, type of infection, and toa certain extent, causative organisms. Publications addressing cystic fibrosis are the subject of a separate update.

Full understanding of infections of the lower respiratory tract requires knowledge of the normal flora of the respiratory tract. An extremely careful study of the distal lung microbiota (sampled by bronchoalveolar lavage and protected specimenbrush) in healthy volunteers contradicts the general assumption that the distal lung is sterile. After careful control for contamination of the bronchoscope during insertion, Charlson and colleagues found that the distal respiratory tract contained analmost identical spectrum of bacteria as the upper respiratory tract but at roughly 2–4 logs lower quantitative counts (1). Distal lung–only isolates were rare and varied from person to person but did include pathogens associated with nosocomialpneumonia. Although study of the lung microbiome is just beginning, changes in the microbiome at this site are likely to have important effects on risk of pneumonia and possibly other respiratory illnesses, similar to those demonstrated foralterations in the gut microbiome (2).

 

COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA

In the era of government and public emphasis on evidence-based medicine encouraged by public reporting of outcomes and pay-forperformance, an appraisal of the evidence supporting the Joint Commission and Centers for Medicare andMedicaid Services community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) performance measures is enlightening. Wilson and Schunemann systematically reviewed the literature and performed meta-analyses for the six main CAP core measures (3). Estimatedeffects of these interventions were favorable for five of the six core measures, although only influenza vaccination was supported by high-quality evidence. Moderate-quality evidence actually suggested one-step smoking cessation counseling wascontraindicated. Their analysis would suggest that two of the performance measures—influenza vaccination and guideline-compliant antibiotics—are reasonable performance measures (3). This disconnect between core measures and high-qualityevidence may partially explain the discordance between improving core measures and documented improvements in actual clinical outcomes.

The largest randomized controlled trial in severe CAP to date, the CAPTIVATE (Community-acquired Pneumonia Tifacogin Intravenous Administration Trial for Efficacy) trial of tissue factor pathway inhibitor for severe CAP, was clearlynegative (4). However, the study demonstrated the feasibility of a large clinical trial focused solely on one form of severe sepsis. CAPTIVATE was the first to use the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society(IDSA/ATS) criteria for severe CAP to define patients appropriate for a clinical trial. The presence of only three minor criteria for severe CAP was associated with 10% mortality, with 25% subsequently developing septic shock or acuterespiratory failure. This subgroup of severe CAP therefore warrants inclusion in future trials of severe CAP.

Recombinant surfactant protein C aerosols also demonstrated no effect on mortality, oxygenation, duration of ventilation, or nonpulmonary organ failure–free days in patients with severe direct lung injury, predominantly pneumonia andaspiration (5). Unfortunately, the negative results may have resulted from partial inactivation of the surfactant by the aerosol generator, which may explain the lack of oxygenation benefit consistently seen in other studies of pulmonary depositionof surfactant.

These two negative clinical trials, combined with the negative PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis)-Shock trial, leave clinicians and clinical investigators attempting to explain thenegative results despite positive preliminary trials (6, 7). But more importantly, the need for adjunctive or supplemental therapy in addition to antibiotics, to reduce the mortality rate in patients with severe CAP, is once again demonstrated inthese trials (8).

 

Viral Pneumonia

Although the pandemic has abated, observations from 2009 H1N1 influenza A infections may have lessons for seasonal cases or future epidemics. Wanzeck and colleagues demonstrate that glycosylation of the hemagglutinin of influenza results inlower antibody responses, lack of neutralizing antibodies, and inability to protect mice from subsequent challenge with less glycosylated strains (9). The clinical relevance is that the recent seasonal H1N1 strain was heavily glycosylated and, inthis same mouse model, prior infection did not protect against the pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza A strain. This may be a partial explanation for the preponderance of severe disease in young adults.

Two large multicenter studies of the 2009 H1N1 epidemic addressed the effect of corticosteroid therapy on outcomes. Brun-Buisson and colleagues retrospectively analyzed steroid treatment in the prospective French cohort of 2009 H1N1influenza A patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (10). Kim and colleagues retrospectively analyzed all patients with the 2009 H1N1 influenza A patients referred to all academic medical centers in Korea (11). Results in bothcohorts were remarkably similar: neither demonstrated a mortality benefit of corticosteroids and both found a higher rate of secondary bacterial infections, particularly pneumonia. Both studies used a propensity-to-receive-corticosteroid score toadjust for differences in baseline characteristics. In addition, Brun-Buisson and colleagues excluded patients with other indications for corticosteroids, such as asthma or acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs),in an effort to isolate the effect on influenza pneumonia specifically (10). Despite several limitations, data from these two studies provide strong evidence against the use of corticosteroids purely for treatment of severe influenza pneumonia, apattern consistent with corticosteroids in case series of other severe viral pneumonias, such as the avian influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic (12). Although proponents are not ready to abandon steroid treatment forheterogeneous groups of patients with ARDS (13), the results of these two studies suggest that inclusion of severe viral pneumonia in these heterogeneous ARDS studies may actually blunt evidence for a beneficial corticosteroid effect in the restof the population.

An animal study suggests a potential alternative treatment for severe influenza pneumonia (14). Transgenic mice that with increased granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) expression in the lungs were protected from aninfluenza challenge lethal in wild-type mice. Intranasal GM-CSF after influenza inoculation also rescued the wild-type mice. Depletion of alveolar macrophages, but not T cells, B cells, or neutrophils, in the transgenic mice resulted in the loss ofthe protective effect of GM-CSF, suggesting enhanced alveolar macrophage function contributes to protection against influenza. The significant barriers to clinical use of GM-CSF for severe viral pneumonia were discussed in the accompanyingeditorial (15).

 

Inhaled Steroids and CAP Outcomes

A number of studies have suggested that inhaled steroid use in patients with COPD increases the risk of pneumonia. Although the risk remains controversial and the mechanism(s) unclear (16), concern has been raised about this possibility. Twopublications addressed this issue. Using adverse event reporting from industry-sponsored clinical trials, O’Byrne and colleagues could not demonstrate an increased risk in patients with asthma who were using inhaled corticosteroids comparedwith placebo (17). They also found no difference in pneumonia risk between budesonide and fluticasone or by dose of budesonide. Chen and colleagues reported on the flip side of the coin (18). Using the Veterans Administration administrativedatabase, they found that prior use of inhaled steroids in patients with COPD admitted with CAP was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.80) and need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.83). No difference inneed for vasopressors was demonstrated. Their results may explain why no increase in all-cause mortality has been seen despite the increased risk of developing CAP in patients with COPD who are receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

 

PNEUMONIA IN THE IMMUNOCOMPROMISED HOST

The changing spectrum of pulmonary disease in patients with HIV disease is documented in a matched cohort of veterans (19). Bacterial pneumonia was still four to five times more likely in HIV-positive veterans less than 50 years old than HIV-negative patients, with lower ratios for older patients. Bacterial pneumonia remains the second most common pulmonary diagnosis in patients with HIV disease, but rates are significantly decreased compared with historical cohorts. Despite this,HIV-positive patients may still benefit from conjugate pneumococcal vaccination (20). A similar pattern is seen for tuberculosis. Pneumocystis pneumonia remains many times more likely in patients with HIV disease but is no longer the mostcommon pulmonary diagnosis. This study clearly documents the increased burden of noninfectious pulmonary disorders in patients with HIV disease, including lung cancer, COPD, pulmonary hypertension, and a new association withpulmonary fibrosis. The shifting spectrum of pulmonary disorders in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy and aging of the HIV-positive population parallels other indicators that HIV disease has now become a chronic disease affectingmultiple organs (21).

Two official ATS statements that deal with pneumonia in the immunocompromised host were published this year (22, 23). The official ATS statement on the treatment of fungal disease in adults distinguishes carefully betweenimmunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients in recommendations for antifungal treatment and other management strategies (23). The official ATS Research Statement reviewed the current state of knowledge regarding the idiopathicpneumonia syndrome after stem cell transplantation, which has frequently been treated as infectious (22). A better understanding of the pathogenesis is likely to lead to new potential interventions since the benefit of corticosteroid therapyremains controversial.

Novel treatment modalities are clearly needed in immunocompromised patients. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is an independent risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), acute rejection, graft failure, and death inlung transplant recipients. Aerosolization of a small interfering RNA, which binds to messenger RNA for the nucleocapsid gene of RSV and induces cleavage, was studied in a small randomized placebo-controlled trial in lung transplant recipientswith RSV-only infections (24). Both clinical symptom scores and, more importantly, incidence of new BOS were lower in treated patients than in patients receiving placebo (6.3 vs. 50%; P ¼ 0.027). Astor reviews this promising new therapeuticapproach and discusses why use for RSV in transplant recipients appears to be a model infection for this new class of therapeutic agents (25).

 

NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA: HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA, VENTILATOR-ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA, AND HEALTHCARE-ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA

Host Defenses

Nosocomial pneumonia remains a common concern in hospitalized patients, and several investigations of the inflammatory response to lung infection have helped us better understand how gram-negative pneumonia can lead to adverseconsequences such as acute lung injury (ALI). Herold and colleagues (26) observed that CC-chemokine receptor-2 (CCR2)–deficient mice had a lack of exudate macrophages, leading to more ALI after LPS challenge. However, intratracheal IL-1receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) enhanced survival after experimental gram-negative pneumonia. The findings indicate that exudate macrophages protect the lung from injury through the up-regulation of IL-1ra. On the other hand, in studies of sepsisother than pneumonia, CCR2-deficient animals also had less of an inflammatory response, which was protective against mortality (27).

A benefit of understanding the host inflammatory response in pneumonia is the potential discovery of novel biomarkers of infection and infection prognosis. Serkova and colleagues reviewed the field of metabolomics to examine the importanceof metabolite detection, gene function, and protein production, using methods such as mass spectroscopy (28). This type of approach may be useful for the determination of etiology in pneumonia, because different bacterial pathogens may havedifferent metabolic profiles with even greater differences in viral infection. For example, Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis is particularly mediated by exoproduct production. Wargo and colleagues demonstrated that phospholipaseC/sphingomyelinase (PC-PLC/SMase) led to loss of lung function in a mouse model of P. aeruginosa pneumonia (29), which was reduced in animals infected with exoproductdeficient strains. Systemic miltefosine, which acts as a substrate forphospholipase C, also protected against this exoproduct-induced loss of lung function. These findings may lead to therapies that ameliorate the development of ALI in patients with P. aeruginosa pneumonia, a common cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

 

Risk Factors and Natural History

One of the current controversies is whether we have already been so effective at identifying risk factors for VAP that we have been able to devise prevention strategies that lead to “zero VAP.” However, prevention of VAP may not be asimportant for the outcome of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) as previously thought, because data suggest no impact on mortality when it does occur (30). A French multicenter study of 4,479 ventilated patients compared the outcome ofthe 685 (15.3%) who acquired VAP with those who did not. The 30-day mortality rate for patients with VAP was 24.1 versus 23.1% for the patients without VAP, thus showing the mortality impact of VAP to be small. The authorsdifferentiated their study results from others by accounting for a change in severity of illness over time, using a marginal structure model in their survival analysis. Although provocative, the findings do not answer a number of questions,particularly concerning the impact of therapy on mortality. No information on the rate of appropriate therapy is provided for a population that had little methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) but nearly 30% non-fermenting gram-negatives. If these pathogens were all treated effectively, then to say that VAP did not impact mortality would be misleading, because mortality would certainly occur if no therapy, or the wrong therapy, were given. In the accompanying editorial,other deficiencies were noted, including the lack of a diagnostic “gold standard,” so that some patients with VAP may have been misclassified as not having VAP, thus underestimating the attributable mortality of the disease (31).

Several investigators have expanded our understanding of VAP risk factors by examining the role of the gastropulmonary route of pathogen acquisition (32), by trying to interrupt this route via maintenance of endotracheal tube cuff pressure(33), and by trying to prevent prolonged intubation by using noninvasive ventilation to facilitate weaning (34). Although noninvasive ventilation was effective at reducing postextubation respiratory failure and death, it did not significantly reducethe incidence of nosocomial pneumonia compared with conventional weaning (34). Interest in endotracheal tube cuffs has renewed, not only with maintenance of adequate pressure to avoid aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions into the lung, butwith attention to composition (polyurethane being preferable to polyvinylchloride) and shape (with a possible value to a tapered cuff shape) (35).

One interesting risk factor for early-onset VAP that has emerged is the use of therapeutic hypothermia following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (36, 37). French investigators examined the incidence of pneumonia within 3 days ofOHCA in a population with widespread use of therapeutic hypothermia (500 of 641 with OHCA). The incidence of early-onset pneumonia (EOP) was 65% in the patients with OHCA (using microbiological sampling in all but 15 patients), andtherapeutic hypothermia was the single independent risk factor for EOP in a multivariate analysis, raising the risk almost twofold. Although EOP did not increase the risk of subsequent VAP, poor neurologic outcome, or mortality, duration ofmechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay increased (36). The accompanying editorial noted that although the bacteriology commonly involved community pathogens, some patients surprisingly harbored resistant pathogens (37). Becausepneumonia incidence was so high in this population, the value of a short course of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with OHCA treated with hypothermia may be worth studying. We also need greater understanding of the biological effects ofhypothermia. Although hypothermia can predispose to pneumonia, hypothermia protected against bacterial dissemination when applied after the onset of pneumococcal pneumonia in an animal model, by preventing sepsis-induced mitochondrialdysfunction (38).

 

Etiologic Pathogens

Most episodes of pneumonia result from microaspiration of bacteria present in the oropharynx into the lung. As demonstrated, the healthy lower respiratory tract contains the same organisms as the oropharynx, only in lower numbers (1). Thesituation in illness may vary, as pointed out in studies of the stomach as a source of pathogens that can reach the lung and cause pneumonia (32), and the possibility that ventilated patients can have organisms directly inoculated into the lung fromthe surrounding environment. The organisms that cause nosocomial pneumonia are increasingly multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. In a study of the bacteriology of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and VAP from 10 Asian countries,involving 73 hospitals, MDR pathogens were common, and if treated incorrectly, led to increased mortality (39). The most common pathogen was S. aureus, followed by Acinetobacter species, P. aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae.Resistance was common in all countries studied, with unique bacteriologic features in each. In VAP, Acinetobacter (36% of patients) was the most common, followed by P. aeruginosa (26%) and S. aureus (12.2%). MDR pathogens occurred inand outside the ICU, and were even present in patients with EOP and no identified MDR risk factors. Methicillin resistance was present in 82% of S. aureus isolates, and 67% of Acinetobacter species and 37% of

P. aeruginosa were resistant to carbapenems. These alarming data indicate that not only does each country, but each ICU, needs to know their local microbial pathogens to design effective empiric therapies, especially because discordant therapyincreases mortality. Unfortunately, the only effective agent for pathogens such as Acinetobacter species was colistin, emphasizing the urgent need for new agents active against MDR gram-negatives.

 

Therapy and Prevention

As mentioned, HAP and VAP are often due to MDR gram-negatives, and treatment of these pathogens with existing agents is limited. In this setting, the use of adjunctive aerosolized antibiotics may be valuable. One bold study compared aerosoltherapy of VAP (ceftazidime and amikacin without intravenous therapy) with intravenous ceftazidime and amikacin therapy in a randomized study of 40 patients (40). All patients had susceptible or intermediately sensitive P. aeruginosa.Efficacy of both regimens was comparable, with more early eradication of the pathogen and greater ability to eradicate intermediately susceptible pathogens in the aerosol group. Recurrence of infection did occur in 3 of 20 aerosol-treated patientsversus 1 of 20 comparator patients. Use of a vibrating mesh plate nebulizer led to greater than 60% retention in the lungs, but the expiratory line filter became obstructed in three patients, and one had a transient cardiac arrest. Although thefindings are promising, given current challenges with MDR pathogens, aerosol therapy is likely to be most useful as an adjunct to intravenous therapy, as suggested by results of another blinded study (41).

In the past year, several studies examined the impact of the ATS/IDSA guidelines for managing HAP, VAP, and healthcareassociated pneumonia (HCAP) (42). One controversial study of VAP (n ¼ 132) and HAP/HCAP (n ¼ 171) concludedthat patients who received therapy “compliant” with the guidelines had increased mortality (43). A number of issues limit full acceptance of this conclusion, including the observation that appropriate therapy did not lead to improved survival forpatients infected with P. aeruginosa or MRSA (44). In addition, the definition of compliant therapy did not consider deescalation (which was often not done) or the timing and dosing of appropriate therapy. Controversy regarding use of thenosocomial pneumonia antibiotic regimen in patients with HCAP also amplified in the last year, with studies from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom indicating that many patients with HCAP can be successfully treated with aCAP regimen, and that a broader spectrum regimen may be harmful (45–47). The heterogeneity of patients with HCAP is increasingly clear, and the correct approach probably depends on each patient’s risk factors for MDR pathogens (48).

The fact that ventilator bundles, although useful, may not realistically lead to “zero VAP” indicates the need for additions to these routine measures. Maintenance of cuff pressure above 25 cm H2O with a continuous control device waseffective in reducing VAP (33), as was use of intermittent, rather than continuous, subglottic secretion drainage (49). However, it is important to note that, although both interventions were beneficial, VAP rates were not reduced to zero.Subglottic secretion drainage reduced late-onset VAP rates to 18.6% (49), and continuous maintenance of cuff pressure reduced VAP rates to 9.8% (33). When using a bundle or other methods to reduce VAP, a robust method to implement andmonitor the use of these interventions is important. Prompting to enhance adherence to use of a daily checklist for recommended processes of care may improve use of antibiotics and impact mortality (50).

 

ACUTE EXACERBATION OF COPD

AECOPDs have too often been treated as a single entity (51). Using unbiased statistical tools, Bafadhel and coworkers were able to classify AECOPDs into four biological clusters—bacterial, viral, eosinophilic, and pauciinflammatory—anddefine biomarkers characterizing each cluster (52). Baseline biomarker data predicted both eosinophilic and bacterial exacerbations but not viral exacerbations. These clusters could not be distinguished by the Anthonisen criteria (53), which havebeen used extensively in registration trials to indicate bacterial AECOPDs. The easiest clinical biomarker was peripheral eosinophilia (.2%), which defines eosinophilic exacerbations. Although some of the other biomarkers used to define clustersare not easily obtained currently, the ability to distinguish types of AECOPD is likely to increase correct management (51), although these trials to demonstrate this approach are yet to be completed.

Rhinovirus was the most common documented cause of the 29% of AECOPDs that were virus-predominant in the study by Bafadhel and colleagues (52). Experimental exposure studies have documented that rhinovirus can clearly cause allthe symptomatology of an AECOPD (54). Patients with COPD appear to have impaired IFN-g responses from BAL cells compared with normal people exposed to rhinovirus. Patients with asthma also have increased risk of exacerbation withrhinovirus infection (55). Even infants with increased airway resistance were more likely to wheeze when infected with rhinovirus (56). Thus, rhinovirus joins RSV as a major cause of worse bronchospasm in patients with underlying obstructivelung disease. In contrast, viruses do not appear to play a major role in acute exacerbations of pulmonary fibrosis, despite an extensive search (57).

 

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

 

References

  1. 1. Charlson ES, Bittinger K, Haas AR, Fitzgerald AS, Frank I, Yadav A, Bushman FD, Collman RG. Topographical continuity of bacterial populations in the healthy human respiratory tract. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:957–963.
  2. 2. Cernadas M. It takes a microbiome: commensals, immune regulation, and allergy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:149–150.
  3. 3. Wilson KC, Schunemann HJ. An appraisal of the evidence underlying performance measures for community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:1454–1462.
  4. 4. Wunderink RG, Laterre PF, Francois B, Perrotin D, Artigas A, Vidal LO, Lobo SM, Juan JS, Hwang SC, Dugernier T, et al. Recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:1561–1568.
  5. 5. Spragg RG, Taut FJ, Lewis JF, Schenk P, Ruppert C, Dean N, Krell K, Karabinis A, Gunther A. Recombinant surfactant protein C–based surfactant for patients with severe direct lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:1055–1061.
  6. 6. Brower RG, Fessler HE. Another “negative” trial of surfactant: time to bury this idea? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:966–968.
  7. 7. Sanchez JF, Le L, Arroliga AC. How tifacogin could not captivate severe community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183:1449–1450.
  8. 8. Waterer GW, Rello J, Wunderink RG. Management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Am JRespirCritCareMed 2011;183:157–164.
  9. 9. Wanzeck K, Boyd KL, McCullers JA. Glycan shielding of the influenza virus hemagglutinin contributes to immunopathology in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:767–773.
  10. 10. Brun-Buisson C, Richard JC, Mercat A, Thiebaut AC, Brochard L. Early corticosteroids in severe influenza A/H1N1 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183:1200–1206.
  11. 11. Kim SH, Hong SB, Yun SC, Choi WI, Ahn JJ, Lee YJ, Lee HB, Lim CM, Koh Y; Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine H1N1 Collaborative. Corticosteroid treatment in critically ill patients with pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 infection: analytic strategy using propensityscores. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:1207–1214.
  12. 12. Matthay MA, Liu KD. Con: corticosteroids are not indicated for treatment of acute lung injury from H1N1 viral pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:1127–1128.
  13. 13. Annane D. Pro: the illegitimate crusade against corticosteroids for severe H1N1 pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:1125–1126.
  14. 14. Huang FF, Barnes PF, Feng Y, Donis R, Chroneos ZC, Idell S, Allen T, Perez DR, Whitsett JA, Dunussi-Joannopoulos K, et al. GM-CSF in the lung protects against lethal influenza infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:259–268.
  15. Waterer G. GM-CSF and influenza: will saving mice help humans? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:157–158.
  16. Rennard SI, Vestbo J. To use or not to use: clinical decision making in the face of uncertainty. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:284–285.
  17. O’Byrne PM, Pedersen S, Carlsson LG, Radner F, Thoren A, Peterson S, Ernst P, Suissa S. Risks of pneumonia in patients with asthma taking inhaled corticosteroids. Am JRespir CritCareMed 2011;183:589–595.
  18. Chen D, Restrepo MI, Fine MJ, Pugh MJ, Anzueto A, Metersky ML, Nakashima B, Good C, Mortensen EM. Observational study of inhaled corticosteroids on outcomes for COPD patients with pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:312–316.
  19. Crothers K, Huang L, Goulet JL, Goetz MB, Brown ST, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Oursler KK, Rimland D, Gilbert CL, Butt AA, et al. HIV infection and risk for incident pulmonary diseases in the combination antiretroviral therapy era. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183:388–395.
  20. Hung CC, Chang SY, Lee KY, Sun HY, Lu CL. Risk and incidence of pulmonary diseases among HIV-infected patients in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184: 1086–1087, author reply 1087.
  21. Morris A, Crothers K, Beck JM, Huang L. An official ATS workshop report: emerging issues and current controversies in HIV-associated pulmonary diseases. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2011;8:17–26.
  22. Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Griese M, Madtes DK, Belperio JA, Haddad IY, Folz RJ, Cooke KR; American Thoracic Society Committee on Idiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: noninfectious lung injury after hematopoietic stemcell transplantation: idiopathic pneumonia syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:1262–1279.
  23. Limper AH, Knox KS, Sarosi GA, Ampel NM, Bennett JE, Catanzaro A, Davies SF, Dismukes WE, Hage CA, Marr KA, et al. An official American Thoracic Society statement: treatment of fungal infections in adult pulmonary and critical care patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2011;183:96–128.
  24. Zamora MR, Budev M, Rolfe M, Gottlieb J, Humar A, Devincenzo J, Vaishnaw A, Cehelsky J, Albert G, Nochur S, et al. RNA interference therapy in lung transplant patients infected with respiratory syncytial virus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:531–538.
  25. Astor TL. RNA interference, RSV, and lung transplantation: a promising future for siRNA therapeutics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183: 427–428.
  26. Herold S, Tabar TS, Janssen H, Hoegner K, Cabanski M, Lewe-Schlosser P, Albrecht J, Driever F, Vadasz I, Seeger W. Exudate macrophages attenuate lung injury by the release of IL-1 receptor antagonist in gram-negative pneumonia. Am JRespir CritCareMed 2011;183:1380–1390.
  27. Kapoor A, Thiemermann C. Targeting CCR2: a novel therapeutic strategy for septic shock? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:150–151.
  28. Serkova NJ, Standiford TJ, Stringer KA. The emerging field of quantitative blood metabolomics for biomarker discovery in critical illnesses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:647–655.
  29. Wargo MJ, Gross MJ, Rajamani S, Allard JL, Lundblad LK, Allen GB, Vasil ML, Ledair LW, Hogan DA. Hemolytic phospholipase C inhibition protects lung function during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:345–354.
  30. Bekaert M, Timsit JF, Vansteelandt S, Depuydt P, Vesin A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Decruyenaere J, Clec’h C, Azoulay E, Benoit D, et al.Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a reappraisal using causal analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:1133–1139.
  31. Scales DC. Pneumonia in the ICU: a lethal or VAPid complication? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:1097–1098.
  32. Bonten MJ. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and the gastropulmonary route of infection: a pendulum. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184: 991–993.
  33. Nseir S, Zerimech F, Fournier C, Lubret R, Ramon P, Durocher A, Balduyck M. Continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure and microaspiration of gastric contents in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:1041–1047.
  34. Girault C, Bubenheim M, Abroug F, Diehl JL, Elatrous S, Beuret P, Richecoeur J, L’Her E, Hibert G, Capellier G, et al. Noninvasive ventilation and weaning in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure: a randomized multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2011;184:672–679.
  35. Lorente L, Blot S, Rello J. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and cuff shape. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:485–486.
  36. Perbet S, Mongardon N, Dumas F, Bruel C, Lemiale V, Mourvillier B, Carli P, Varenne O, Mira JP, Wolff M, et al. Early-onset pneumonia after cardiac arrest: characteristics, risk factors and influence on prognosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:1048–1054.
  37. Combes A. Early-onset pneumonia after cardiac arrest: an unintended consequence of therapeutic hypothermia? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:993–994.
  38. Beurskens CJ, Aslami H, Kuipers MT, Horn J, Vroom MB, van Kuilenburg AB, Roelofs JJ, Schultz MJ, Juffermans NP. Induced hypothermia is protective in a rat model of pneumococcal pneumonia associated with increased adenosine triphosphate availability and turnover. CritCare Med 2012;40:919–926.
  39. Chung DR, Song JH, Kim SH, Thamlikitkul V, Huang SG, Wang H, So TM, Yasin RM, Hsueh PR, Carlos CC, et al. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant nonfermenters in hospital-acquired pneumonia in Asia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:1409–1417.
  40. Lu Q, Yang J, Liu Z, Gutierrez C, Aymard G, Rouby JJ. Nebulized ceftazidime and amikacin in ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:106–115.
  41. Niederman MS, Chastre J, Corkery K, Fink JB, Luyt CE, Garcia MS. BAY41-6551 achieves bactericidal tracheal aspirate amikacin concentrations in mechanically ventilated patients with gram-negative pneumonia. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:263–271.
  42. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:388–416.
  43. Kett DH, Cano E, Quartin AA, Mangino JE, Zervos MJ, Peyrani P, Cely CM, Ford KD, Scerpella EG, Ramirez JA, et al. Implementation of guidelines for management of possible multidrug-resistant pneumonia in intensive care: an observational, multicentre cohort study. LancetInfect Dis 2011;11:181–189.
  44. Niederman MS, Craven DE, Chastre J, Kollef MH, Luna CM, Torres A, Wunderink RG. Treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11:728, author reply 731–732. [Published erratum appears in Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11:895.]
  45. Grenier C, Pepin J, Nault V, Howson J, Fournier X, Poirier MS, Cabana J, Craig C, Beaudoin M, Valiquette L. Impact of guideline-consistent therapy on outcome of patients with healthcare-associated and community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66: 1617–1624.
  46. Chalmers JD, Taylor JK, Singanayagam A, Fleming GB, Akram AR, Mandal P, Choudhury G, Hill AT. Epidemiology, antibiotic therapy, and clinical outcomes in health care–associated pneumonia: a UK cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:107–113.
  47. Attridge RT, Frei CR, Restrepo MI, Lawson KA, Ryan L, Pugh MJ, Anzueto A, Mortensen EM. Guideline-concordant therapy and outcomes in healthcare-associated pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2011;38: 878–887.
  48. Shorr AF, Zilberberg MD, Reichley R, Kan J, Hoban A, Hoffman J, Micek ST, Kollef MH. Validation of a clinical score for assessing the risk of resistant pathogens in patients with pneumonia presenting to the emergency department. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:193–198.
  49. Lacherade JC, De Jonghe B, Guezennec P, Debbat K, Hayon J, Monsel A, Fangio P, Appere de Vecchi C, Ramaut C, Outin H, et al. Intermittent subglottic secretion drainage and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;182:910–917.
  50. Weiss CH, Moazed F, McEvoy CA, Singer BD, Szleifer I, Amaral LA, Kwansny M, Watts CM, Persell SD, Baker DW, et al. Prompting physicians to address a daily checklist and process of care and clinical outcomes: a single-site study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:680–686.
  51. Hurst JR. Exacerbation phenotyping in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:625–626.
  52. Bafadhel M, McKenna S, Terry S, Mistry V, Reid C, Haldar P, Kebadze T, Duvoix A, Lindblad K, Patel H, et al. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: identification of biologic clusters and their biomarkers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:662–671.
  53. Anthonisen NR, Manfreda J, Warren CP, Hershfield ES, Harding GK, Nelson NA. Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:196–204.
  54. Mallia P, Message SD, Gielen V, Contoli M, Gray K, Kebadze T, Aniscenko J, Laza-Stanca V, Edwards MR, Slater L, et al. Experimental rhinovirus infection as a human model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183:734–742.
  55. Denlinger LC, Sorkness RL, Lee WM, Evans MD, Wolff MJ, Mathur SK, Crisafi GM, Gaworski KL, Pappas TE, Vrtis RF, et al. Lower airway rhinovirus burden and the seasonal risk of asthma exacerbation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:1007–1014.
  56. van der Zalm MM, Uiterwaal CS, Wilbrink B, Koopman M, Verheij TJ, van der Ent CK. The influence of neonatal lung function on rhinovirusassociated wheeze. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:262–267.
  57. Wootton SC, Kim DS, Kondoh Y, Chen E, Lee JS, Song JW, Huh JW, Taniguchi H, Chiu C, Boushey H, et al. Viral infection in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:1698–1702.

 

__________

(Received in original form March 23, 2012; accepted in final form April 24, 2012) Supported in part by 1 U18IP000490-01 CDC/NCIRD Chicago Community-Acquired Pneumonia Consortium II (R.G.W.) and BAA-NAIAD-DMID-NIHAI2009058 Targeted Clinical Trials to Reduce the Risk ofAntimicrobial Resistance (R.G.W.).

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Richard G. Wunderink, M.D., Pulmonary and Critical Care, 676 North St. Clair Street, Arkes 14-044, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail: r-wunderink@northwestern.edu

Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 185, Iss. 12, pp 1261–1265, Jun 15, 2012 Copyright ª 2012 by the American Thoracic Society DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0540UP Internet address: www.atsjournals.org

 

Влезте или се регистрирайте безплатно, за да получите достъп до пълното съдържание и статиите на списанието в PDF формат.
 

Вашият коментар